Kokutai to bio-politics to national identity
On Friday’s conference about Imperial Sovereignty &
Colonial Violence, Max Ward talked about the logic and principles behind the
infamous Peace Preservation Law that was established in 1925 and was in effect
until 1945. He explained this law was
placed to suppress left-wing political parties like the anarchists and
communists deeming them as a dangerous foreign thought to the kokutai, national
essence of Japan. Max Ward placed great focus on this notion of
kokutai and how it was perceived throughout the imperial space, both in the
metropole and within the colony. He also
mentions the importance of how kokutai does not have a precise definition
providing ground for various interpretations and logics. Kokutai with this context was used to create
a boundary for the law to determine what was considered a dangerous foreign
thought to the national essence without clearly defining what national essence
was referring to. Later on the law
serves to function as a mechanism for nation building by the means of
conversion, or tenkou, of the once ideologically dangerous individuals, shisouhan
or thought criminals, to basically labour force for nation-building. This idea of conversion has a different
context in the colonies in which it is through their admiration towards Japan
that they establish their paradoxical national identity of being Japanese as a
colonial subject and not Japanese within the metropole where Japanese just
awaken to their national identity.
In the 2008 South Korean Western film, The Good, the Bad, the Weird, there is a subtle yet strong presence
of the Peace Preservation Law or its idea of kokutai amidst the background of
the main plot. The very presence of the Korean national
liberation movement was something that went against the kokutai of the Japanese
Empire. According to the Peace
Preservation law, anything that is set to alter the national essence and threaten
the private property clauses were seen as something close to thought-crimes. There were also cases where according to the
home ministry, the Korean independence movement was trying to achieve their
goals through the communist movement. So
there is this on-going conflict of nation-building within the film. Even the treasure that served as the main
plot device for the film turned to be oil, which basically represents the idea
of modernization or nation building the two groups were striving for.
Lenin Amaya
Lenin Amaya
No comments:
Post a Comment