So this film is hardly the best example of looking into the
real history of Modern Korea – jokingly inserted anachronistic persona and
props, the director seems to have a good time playing/teasing ignorant.
But a film, in general, is not held responsible of
misinterpreting history, or even fabricating its own – it is history enlarged,
animated and fictionalized. I found the perspective of “The Good, the Bad and
the Weird” rather engaging because it seems to take no stance at all – almost as
a documentary quality of recording three characters (there were even some
intentional shaky follow-ups and camera abuse) Even the bad guy, with little moral
principle is shown in a mildly sympathetic light. This applies to the Japanese,
the collaborators, the theft and the killer – “all singing, all dancing cLap of
the world,” of this farce, borrowed from Tyler Durden.
Indeed, compared to “From Wonso Pond” when presenting class
division, social gap and national identity crisis “The Good, the Bad and the
Weird” devotes an effort too meager to be taken seriously – but it was not a
time of reason, either. (Professor Ward mentions the cleansing mentality
through labor and intellectual
censorship – ironically, Communism was the leading force of (South) Korean
independence back then). I understand and admire Kang Kyong Ae’s passion
but I hardly see her work could
widely appeal modern readers, Korean or otherwise.
Surely we need both for documentation and reflection, but
then when I think of it – remembering in a scene when the cart is filled with
blond, black and brother Cath,
the question would be: will there be a time that we become unsure of our
nationalities again? I am all for Italia.
No comments:
Post a Comment