Along with a newfound
fear of flickering lights and brightly lit doors at the end of dark hallways, Epitaph left a deep impression with its
narrative timeline and by extension, its manipulation of information. We see
what the director shows us and thus know the truth only as the director wants
us to see it. New information and details added in the second shot of the scene
changes the context and our understanding of the story and characters as does
seeing how the events slot in together. We assume certain things and then are
forced to re-evaluate and come to new conclusions e.g. Which spouse is
ultimately the real ghost? Does the surgery still count as a success after the
murder and the subsequent destruction of lives?
This ties in with
Reddy’s point about understanding the multiple modernities that exist and
creating knowledge that is based on context rather than a specific
epistemology. At first it was just a ghost killing Japanese soldiers, evoking simply
fear and curiosity about the identity, but more background context changed my
stance, the killer ghost becoming a grieving spouse driven mad and seeking
revenge, this time garnering sympathy and understanding. Similarly, without
knowing the history and the transformation of societies and areas, we cannot
understand them the way everyone deserves to be understood. The narrative
timeline also speaks to Reddy’s reflection that to “situate interventions in
the context of late modernity” may mean, “examining the erasures, gaps and
incompletions.” Epitaph shows the importance of things omitted – our
understanding changed as new scenes were added e.g. the mother protecting Asako
during the crash and reassuring her even as she died – would a loving mom come
back to haunt her daughter or stay to care for her (disregarding the question
of whether or not the ghosts are simply generated through guilt and love).
The timeline and
manipulation of information is also reminiscent of the propaganda that would
happen in regards to colonization and spread of modernity. The idea of
modernity can be twisted to suit aims and lead people in one direction as was
done so easily in the movie e.g. show people only the good side of colonization
and modernity and keep them in the dark about the bad and ugly sides. The movie
reinforced just how easy that is to do, playing with our perceptions and
understanding.
The
vast difference in definitions of modern was also mirrored in Epitaph with the
use of juxtaposition of scenes and emotions: darker, more sinister scenes of
death and decay separated brightly lit mundane scenes. One very striking scene
was when the light flickered, throwing everything into light and dark, showing
us explicitly just how different the same thing could be. The contrasts are
jarring and hard to reconcile but are part of the same story and are required
to tell the whole story which also ties back to the idea of needing background
information.
No comments:
Post a Comment